Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Double-check the implicitWidth/implicitHeight calculations to ensure edge cases (like varying content or inset sizes) are handled correctly.
- The vertical and horizontal ScrollBar ‘active’ bindings reference each other, creating a circular dependency; consider decoupling those to avoid binding loops.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `src/qml/ScrollView.qml:18-23` </location>
<code_context>
+    implicitHeight: Math.max(implicitBackgroundHeight + topInset + bottomInset,
+                             contentHeight + topPadding + bottomPadding)
+
+    D.ScrollBar.vertical: D.ScrollBar {
+        parent: control
+        x: control.mirrored ? 0 : control.width - width
+        y: control.topPadding
+        height: control.availableHeight
+        active: control.D.ScrollBar.horizontal.active
+    }
+
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**question (bug_risk):** The vertical scrollbar's 'active' property references the horizontal scrollbar's 'active' state, which may be confusing.

Please verify if the vertical scrollbar should depend on the horizontal scrollbar's 'active' state. If independent control is intended, adjust the logic accordingly.
</issue_to_address>

### Comment 2
<location> `src/qml/ScrollView.qml:26-31` </location>
<code_context>
+        active: control.D.ScrollBar.horizontal.active
+    }
+
+    D.ScrollBar.horizontal: D.ScrollBar {
+        parent: control
+        x: control.leftPadding
+        y: control.height - height
+        width: control.availableWidth
+        active: control.D.ScrollBar.vertical.active
+    }
 }
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**question (bug_risk):** The horizontal scrollbar's 'active' property references the vertical scrollbar's 'active' state, which may cause circular or unintended activation.

Consider refactoring to avoid circular dependencies between scrollbar 'active' states, or add documentation if synchronization is intended.
</issue_to_address>